Look at the dirt – quick tips for authenticating neolithic and ancient Chinese pottery

real verse fake chinese porcelain-earthenware-ceamic-terracotta

Super quick post regarding a recent discussion I was having about cleaning antiquities, particularly those which would have been buried underground. While there are many highly specialized and scientific ways to authenticate a piece (for example TL testing), there are also some very practical clues one can look out for. For example dirt. When an item has been buried underground for millenia, the soil itself will likely take on certain characteristics, which are easily seen when compared to some of the more obvious fakes. There are differences in climates to account for but a general rule is that dirt does not equate to age. Fakers, particularly in the case of lower end fakes, will opt for lots of dirt under the assumption that the uninitiated buyer will equate dirt with age. This is particularly true with pottery, earthenware and ceramics, though holds true to a degree with furniture as well. So lets quickly compare the soil compacted on the surfaces of both an authentic piece and an obvious reproduction.

real verse fake chinese porcelain-earthenware-ceamic-terracotta

The fake on the left is about 2 years old. The jar on the right is about 2000 years old. Notice the extreme differences in the soil compacted on the surface of each jar? The fake has had mud compacted on its surface to simulate burial. Its dry, crumbly and peals away easily leaving little residue.  It feels more like its been sunk into a muddy field for a short period of time, rather then in a tomb for several thousand years. The one on the right is covered in a thick, very finely compacted build up of hard soil. Nor does it crack away easily. This is the product of gradual build up over a very long period of time. Its completely dried out, yet extremely dense and does not remove easily.

Related Books & Reading

No More Fake Reading: Merging the Classics With Independent Reading to Create Joyful, Lifelong Readers (Corwin Literacy)No More Fake Reading: Merging the Classics With Independent Reading to Create Joyful, Lifelong Readers (Corwin Literacy)

For middle and high school teachers, it’s one of today’s most vexing problems: How do you motivate students with varied interests and little ap... Read More >

Eat Dirt: Why Leaky Gut May Be the Root Cause of Your Health Problems and 5 Surprising Steps to Cure ItEat Dirt: Why Leaky Gut May Be the Root Cause of Your Health Problems and 5 Surprising Steps to Cure It

From functional medicine expert and wellness authority Dr. Josh Axe, a groundbreaking guide to diagnosing and treating an often-discussed yet littl... Read More >

Rom, Royal Ontario Museum, The East Asian GalleriesRom, Royal Ontario Museum, The East Asian GalleriesChronologies. Bibliographies. Map. 81 B/W illustrations. 55p. ROM has had a long-standing commitment to East Asian art. This booklet looks at the mid-twentieth century collection.

3 Comment

  1. […] Antiquities trade professional Roger Schwendeman explained: ‘Fakers, particularly in the case of lower end fakes, will opt for [applying] lots of dirt under the assumption that the uninitiated buyer will equate dirt with age.’ […]

  2. Peter Van Deventer says:

    oger,

    not sure if you are still monitoring this, but I have a question. A great friend of mine from China has given me a “Han Dynasty” vase. it has the appropriate dirt on it and he claims it is authentic. Would you clean it with a soft cloth and warm water? it doesn’t look so good with the mud on it, and I’m assuming it is a much better artifact without the mud. Thoughts?

    thanks.

    Regards, Pete.

  3. Peter, post images of it here: https://www.facebook.com/groups/903467689720550/
    Depending on what it is, it may need special care. Usually for han pieces, if painted, water might remove the color.

Leave a Reply